This was my first experience as a reviewer for any grant process and I feel very fortunate to have been asked to attend. My overall impression is that as difficult as it seems on the grant-writer side, it is equally as complicated on the grant-creator and grant-reviewer sides. I approached the work with few expectations, though found the time involved in reviewing eight 90-page proposals a lot of work. Assessing each proposal also was complex for me, as I have specific knowledge of mentoring programming that wasn't applicable for reviewing and assessing the proposals. For example, a proposal that assures the federal government 200 mentors would be recruited, screened, trained and matched within six weeks is probably unrealistic (this is an exaggeration, not from an actual proposal - but not by much), but that kind of timeline and outcome was not a consideration for any of the criteria.
From this experience, here's my quick list of Dos and Don'ts when it comes to responding to any RFPs:
Do
- Address all the criteria requested
- Carefully read criteria requested
- Make a case for your program or project
- Show how experienced and qualified your staff really is
- Explain in simple terms how your program or project fits the criteria
- Follow guidelines for formatting
- Use local statistics as much as possible
- Include extraneous information - save your space for what's needed!
- Misinterpret criteria requested - see above
- Assume the reviewers know your community or agency
- Plan to hire your family members with this funding
- Try to make your program or project fit if it really doesn't
- Abuse the guidelines for formatting - irritated reviewers who can't read 6-point font on the budget sheets are not what you want!
- Try to allude to national statistics to make the case for your community
0 comments:
Post a Comment